The Revenue Architect

The Revenue Architect

How to respond to an RFP

A step-by-step system for winning competitive bids

Arnie Gullov-Singh's avatar
Arnie Gullov-Singh
May 21, 2026
∙ Paid

Most B2B SaaS companies treat RFPs like a homework assignment, rushing through at the last minute and handing it in hoping for partial credit. Then they wonder why their win rate on competitive bids is in the toilet.

The problem isn’t your product. It’s your process. RFPs are a structured buying exercise, and if you don’t have an equally structured selling process to match, you’re just filling out a form and praying.

I’ve watched companies with genuinely better products lose RFPs to inferior competitors because the winning team showed up more prepared. The good news is its not hard to stand out with a little effort.

This post covers:

  • How to decide which RFPs are worth your time (most aren’t)

  • How to staff and run a response without it becoming a fire drill

  • How to build win themes that actually influence the decision

  • How to avoid starting from scratch every single time

  • What to do after you hit send


Stop responding to RFPs you can’t win

The most expensive thing you can do with an RFP is spend time on it when the buyer has already made their mind up to go with a competitor and is just using you as a filler in their process.

The immediate signs to look out for are:

  • No relationship access. If you’re a complete outsider with no prior contact, you’re probably just filling out a form for the incumbent’s reference check.

  • No opportunity to submit clarifying questions. If they won’t let you ask questions the process usually has a predetermined outcome.

  • Overly prescriptive technical requirements. Especially when they eerily describe a particular vendor’s product. I know because I’ve done exactly this.

  • Extremely short timelines. Tells you the decision has been made but the buyer is scrambling to show they got at least 3 quotes.

  • Poor deal economics. The budget has to justify the effort. A $40K deal that takes three weeks of cross-functional effort isn’t a win even if you win it.

Walking away from a bad RFP is a legitimate call. There’s no point spending time on it if you know you aren’t going to win it.


Every RFP needs a deal owner and assigned roles

Disorganized RFP responses are almost always an ownership problem. Everyone thinks someone else is handling the security and privacy sections. Nobody owns the executive summary until the night before the deadline.

Fix it by assigning roles:

  1. RFP Lead / Deal Owner. The AE or VP Sales. This person has final accountability for the response and the go/no-go call. They also write the executive summary, because they’re closest to the deal.

  2. Project Manager. Sales ops. Owns the timeline, tracks tasks, and makes sure nothing falls through. In a smaller GTM team, this role is done by the deal owner, which underscores the importance of ignoring RFPs that you can’t win.

  3. Solution Architect. Your pre-sales or SE lead. In smaller companies, the CTO. Owns the technical narrative, integration questions, and architecture sections. Need to be able to connect your technical capabilities to the RFP requirements.

  4. Subject Matter Experts. Product, security, legal. Narrow the scope, with specific questions and tight deadlines. Don’t loop them into the whole process.

  5. Executive Reviewer. The VP Sales or CRO does one pass at the end, looking for clear win themes and differentiation, not just typos.


Work backwards from the RFP deadline

A 2-week response cycle is manageable if you sequence it properly. Most teams don’t, they front-load coordination and back-load writing, which means the actual response gets written in a panic during the final 48 hours.

Here’s the sequence that works:

Days 1–2: Intake and kick-off. Log the RFP in your CRM. Distribute the document. Hold a kick-off call where scope gets reviewed, owners get assigned, and the timeline gets locked. Submit clarifying questions to the prospect immediately. Most RFPs allow them, and the answers often change how you approach the response.

Days 3–5: First draft. Pull from your content library (more on this below). SMEs complete their assigned sections. The solution architect writes the technical narrative. Pricing prepares the commercial section. Nothing gets polished yet — the goal is completeness, not perfection.

Days 6–8: Review cycle. PM checks for completeness. SE validates technical accuracy. Legal and compliance do their pass. The deal owner and executive reviewer look at win themes and overall messaging. This is also when you catch internal contradictions where the product team is saying one thing, the SE saying another.

Days 9-11: Final polish. All edits incorporated, conflicts resolved. Proposal writer does a copy edit and formats the document. The executive summary gets written last because it’s a synthesis, not an introduction.

Days 12-14: Buffer and submission. Final sign-off, submit at least 24 hours before the deadline, and confirm receipt with the prospect contact.


How to build win themes

Most RFP responses answer questions. The best ones tell a story where the prospect’s problem is the setup and your product is the resolution. Win themes.

Before writing starts, align the team on three or four win themes. These aren’t marketing taglines, they’re the strategic bets you’re making about what this evaluator cares about most.

How to develop them:

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Arnie Gullov-Singh · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture